We already heard from Mr. Clark in the study on the reform of medicine prices. He was among those who were saying that groups of patients were being bribed by the pharmaceutical industry. I believe that his opinions are well founded.
A careful reading of the two letters of resignation indicates that for at least one of those who resigned, there was an issue of internal resistance. I can't see why at the outset we would invite someone who resigned from their job. Whether or not that person was at the organization is one thing, but the person at issue is just someone who has resigned, and whose positions we are aware of, and if we need further testimony, we can hear it afterwards.
What I would like to know is why Mr. Herder and Ms. Forcier resigned and what the minister had to do with these two resignations. I don't need any clarification from a fourth person who did not produce any documents that would justify this study.