I have just a short comment.
Typically we discuss about a motion and then we ask each side to submit their witnesses. We don't sit here and argue about who's going to submit what witnesses and why or why not.
Let us simply consider the motion as put forward. We are in agreement about the amendment. Now we are asked to go back and submit our witnesses by the end of the day on Friday. The list of witnesses is in front of us, and everybody is agreeing—except for one of our colleagues—about whether Mr. Clark is relevant or not.
Our member from the NDP says he's relevant and he's going to submit his name on the witness list, so he's going to be on the list of witnesses to be called. It's as simple as that.
Thank you.