A motion to challenge the chair is not debatable. We're going to proceed directly to a vote. Just so we're all clear on what we're voting on, I have ruled that the motion has not been adopted and that Mr. Thériault is to have the floor to move his amendment. That ruling has been challenged.
The question for you is whether the ruling of the chair shall be sustained.
Do we need to do a standing vote on something like this? No?
By a show of hands, on the ruling of the chair that Mr. Thériault is now allowed to present an amendment and the motion has not yet passed, is it the will of the committee to sustain the ruling of the chair?
All those in favour of sustaining the chair...one, two, three, four, five.
All those opposed...one, two, three, four, five.
Madam Sidhu, did you vote in favour or opposed?