I wanted to reiterate a few points for the record.
One is that I think Mr. Davies and Mr. van Koeverden have both spoken eloquently. I won't reiterate their emphasis on the need to proceed with urgency, but it is important.
Because this is about the point of order and not the evidence, I think it would be useful to be able to listen to our witnesses, because the effect of marketing on children is clear. There is substantial evidence.
As a committee, although we have an obligation to hear from all sides of a question, we also have an obligation to build on knowledge that we have already accumulated, and there is an urgency to proceed with this bill after years of delay. To echo Ms. Sidhu's final point, there will be room for organizations to have a voice in this, both in the Senate and in the regulatory process, so this is not the last chance for organizations to provide input as to how this will ultimately be published in regulation.
Thank you for that.