Thank you, Mr. Chair.
I find it unwieldy when we begin a meeting by saying we'll pick up where we left off, because I'm not sure that we [Technical difficulty—Editor] helpful. I'm not really sure that we were all on the same page where we left off. I think we should just start afresh at this meeting, but I think we all understand what Mike has suggested.
It might be wise, procedurally, for the clerk to read the two motions.
If I'm understanding it correctly, I think we're going to go with Mr. Hanley's motion to study the health care human resources crisis first. I thought I understood that there might be a change to the number of meetings proposed in there for witnesses. I'm not sure. I'll leave that to Mike to clarify. Then we're also going to move after that study to the study on children's health that was moved by Mr. Berthold, I think.
I think we'll need to have both of those motions formally read for your benefit, Mr. Chair and Clerk. One thing I wanted to clarify is that the witnesses in both cases will be as per the formula that Mr. Lake described.