We could vote on the amendment, but I'd like to get more clarification. I wonder if I can get it right now to speed up the process.
When we agreed to consider all the testimony gathered in the course of the studies conducted during the previous parliament, that was so we could continue discussing pandemic follow‑up. Even though we didn't expressly address that aspect during the committee's last two meetings, we had a kind of tacit agreement that, out of a total 28 meetings until June, 14 would focus on pandemic follow‑up, pursuant to the motion that we adopted to consider previous testimony, and the other 14 would be used to conduct other studies.
However, two of those 28 meetings have already gone by. I see we're now going to adopt a first motion proposing a study that will take up 8 meetings, in addition to an upcoming study that will take up 6. From what I understand, 14 meetings will be reserved for those 2 studies, which means that, if we continue at this pace, there'll be no room to conduct other studies suggested by other parties.
Consequently, I am announcing that I'll be introducing amendments to change the number of meetings that has been proposed for those studies.