We have some momentum.
I'm going to start discussing Mr. Berthold's motion on child health. In the spirit of what Mr. Davies said, I will go back to the original motion.
Just to remind everybody, a change has been made to Luc's original motion to make sure we have addressing children's nutritional needs in it, so it's already in the motion and we don't need to make that amendment, just in case it comes up. It had already been changed in your original motion, I think.
There are six meetings, and we're good with that.
We said that we would try this formula out in two studies, so we're going to add the exact same wording into this motion after point number three, “the study consist of a minimum of 6 witness meetings”. We would add the same language, which is “that witnesses for this study be allocated in the following fashion: one-third for the Liberal Party members of the committee; one-third for the Conservative Party members of the committee; one-sixth for the Bloc Québécois member of the committee; and one-sixth for the New Democratic member of the committee.
I'll move that amendment, and then I think there was an amendment that the Bloc wanted to move last time. I think we had agreed to it, but it didn't ever get officially wired in, so that is just a reminder to Mr. Thériault that he may want to do that afterwards.
I'll just leave my amendment as it is right now.