Absolutely. The way the food policy is structured.... For example, we wouldn't see something that would be limited in this category but also recommended as part of the food guide, because it's the same basis of data we go by. Things like that—fruits, vegetables and whole foods—are recommended as part of your daily intake. It is definitely not the intent of any policy to exclude all of those.
Again, as for the definitions of what would be included or not included, we would put those in the regulations. I can understand the desire to have it a bit higher, but if it's in the act, it has to be defined somewhere as well. If down the road terminology changes, or something else changes, it makes it that much more difficult to then go back to the act to try to make those revisions. That's just the technical part of it.
Certainly, in terms of the process to develop the regulations and to define the foods that would be included in that prohibition, again, we're looking at that body of evidence. It would be in line with the food guide. There are other policies. The WHO has policies as well in terms of how to define those products. There is a process there to develop the products.
I think David wanted to add to that.