If foods are covered by the regulation, they are certainly prescribed. Why would this need to be specified in the act? Is it because the second “prescribed” is not sufficient?
It says “advertising of prescribed foods that contain more than the prescribed levels of sugars, saturated fat or sodium in a manner [...]”. However, saying “prohibit the advertising of foods that contain more than the prescribed levels of sugars, fats” would be completely correct, right?
Isn't it enough to say it like that and just take out the first “prescribed”? What am I not understanding? Can someone explain this to me in a different way?