Mr. van Koeverden, I am advised that we need to deal with the amendments in the order in which they've come forward. The reason for that is that, if we consider G-3, it would render CPC-2 and CPC-3 effectively defunct. We wouldn't be able to deal with those if we dealt with them in the order you are proposing.
Yes, you're within your rights to move an amendment, but unless we move them in the order that they are seeking to amend sections in the bill, we will not be in a position to consider these amendments that have been properly put forward to the committee.
No, we're not going to move to G-3 until we hear whether CPC-2 and CPC-3 are going to be moved. Then we can go to G-3.
Do we have a mover for CPC-2?
Go ahead, Mr. Jeneroux.