I'm going to provide a quick clarification, to put it on the record. I'm not saying that a one health approach isn't crucial. As you said in your preamble, it's a critical approach to preventing pandemic risk. I believe that as well. Having said that, I was referring to a study that is currently being done on children's health, but which has only been funded for two years. These people will soon be tabling their results. If this is a crucial approach, why not fund it for the long term? That's the point I was making earlier.
On the other hand, you say that we should drop the idea of an independent investigation into what went wrong despite all the measures that were already in place. However, that is a prerequisite, in my opinion.
Since Mr. Powlowski touted your freedom of thought, I'll ask you: do you support an independent, public inquiry?