In short, yes.
Don, I appreciate the proposal. Let me say that the intention was never to oust any kind of independent review. If you remember SARS in Ontario, we had an independent commission and then a properly independent judicial commission. We also had, at the federal level, a national advisory committee on SARS and public health, which was more what I was imagining. That was chaired by David Naylor.
I consulted with David Naylor, by the way, in the course of putting this bill together. At no point had I intended to oust some parallel, independent track. It was really to ask how we invest, form a plan and make sure a review is a component of that. I don't want any distraction. I don't want this to be a bill to point to and say that a review is happening so we don't need another more searching review.
To return to the short answer, yes, I completely support your proposal. Let's keep the core of the bill the core of the bill, which is the architecture of accountability.