Why would one have to gloss over any conclusions? It makes no sense. The bill doesn't ask for them to gloss over any conclusions. The bill says that these factors have to be considered in a plan. Whatever conclusion an independent review comes to or any other review for that matter, this sets an architecture in place that can encapsulate that learning. This doesn't make a decision to say this should have happened or that should have happened and presuppose a review.
On April 20th, 2023. See this statement in context.