I didn't have specific discussions with that organization, no. However, I take your point that we do need, and the bill specifically speaks to the need, to emphasize and describe the state of the research in relation to infectious disease prevention and preparedness, but also the establishment and interlinking of surveillance systems inside and outside of Canada, which is critical for early-stage assessment of risk and making sure we're able to respond quickly to ensure that it doesn't turn into a pandemic in many cases.
It's a good organization to have attend as a witness, frankly. I would just say, if you are able to.... I know it's always tough with private members' business, but if you are able to set aside a few meetings for witnesses, I think it will really help. Once you bracket out the review portion, which I know has been causing more consternation and focus, to Ms. Goodridge's point, I think if we really focus in on the contents of the plan and make sure we tighten up the language there—and experts will be able to help with that—we'll be in good shape going forward.