Yes, sure. You lead with that, Mr. Chair, and we'll see how that goes.
Getting back to the issue at hand, we had in front of us last week a Dr. Lennox. He was suggesting that there was an informal registry that already exists throughout his colleagues—he's through UBC—and obviously it's not publicly funded. Also, I'm looking at some of the other countries here: Sweden, the United States and Netherlands. They are all funded either by associations or by something similar.
I don't think the issue is so much.... On this committee, we've heard from all sides who want to ensure we're doing everything we can to protect those who are experiencing these illnesses. Going forward to your tree analogy, Dr. Morris, I thought that was rather apt. How do we get there? I guess that is the question facing this committee, at least in my opinion.
On the private versus publicly funded piece, I heard Dr. Greaves touch on the publicly funded piece. I might start with you, Dr. Greaves, and then go around to the two in the room here in getting the pros and cons for us to assess this question.