That's a very good question.
Definitely when you look at imaging, it's true that the capital investment is quite significant, but the cost of not having a timely diagnosis is really expensive. We need to take into consideration that balance of the money we put in, the investment, and the cost efficiency of the benefit we will have on the patient workflow and patient care. In that regard, it's clear there is more and more investment now in information technologies, on new technologies that will facilitate that workflow and that will really put us in a position to treat more patients more efficiently in a shorter duration of time. If we target our investment, we can really have a good return on investment.
Another example is the clinical decision support system. With this kind of information system the first-line physician can really do the imaging requisition, but he is guided when he does that to be sure that the requisition is appropriate or relevant for the patient. Having this kind of system installed across Canada, we can save 10% or 15% of unnecessary examinations, so the return on investment can be very good.
We need to really focus on that balance.