Thank you very much, Chair, for redoing that. I know how difficult it is sitting there to do that.
There are a couple of things that are part of the difficulty with the creation of the Inquiries Act. Number one is that it entirely changes the meaning of this private member's bill, which, again, will realistically make trying to go through the rest of part I rather ridiculous. I think my colleague from the NDP has made clear the importance of private members' bills since they often do not get to the floor of the House of Commons. Indeed, there have been people who have sat in the House of Commons for many years and not had a private member's bill. Certainly, during my incredibly eloquent speech, I think he made it very clear several times how important private members' bills were. This, in effect, would realistically negate the entire opportunity for this member to have a private member's bill.
If we really believed there's absolutely no benefit to this, why would we proceed?
Perhaps I will have this wrong, but I would like to propose a subamendment to delete all words after the title of this bill.