Okay.
Mr. Davies makes a valid point of order with respect to the relevance of Mr. Doherty's presentation to the matter before the committee. What has been called is clause 2. He also makes a valid point that, if Mr. Doherty wishes to present a motion to resume debate, that's in order, but a lengthy discussion on something other than clause 2 isn't.
There is a fair degree of latitude that rests with the chair with respect to relevance and repetition. All I would say to Mr. Doherty is that it is a valid point. If you wish to move a motion to resume debate, that would be in order, but a lengthy discussion of something other than clause 2 isn't.
You have the floor, sir.