First of all, the amendment removes adding the extra hour, so that isn't what's under debate right now. I think you're asking for some advice from the clerk as to whether, if we defeat the amendment and come back to the original motion, it's doable from an administrative perspective.
The answer is that we don't have an answer now, but we can look into it and get back to you. At this point, we don't know. It isn't an unreasonable request, but that doesn't mean it's going to be granted.
I do have Mr. Thériault on the list, but I want to get clear on this subamendment before we get there. I want to clarify something in connection with the subamendment, but the speakers list is Ms. Sidhu, Mr. Thériault and Mr. Fisher at this point.
With respect to the subamendment, Dr. Ellis, I believe there are two things you want to amend in the amendment. One is that the amendment calls for four hours of meetings, and you want to insert the words “up to”. On the list of witnesses contained in the amendment, you want to add the Minister of Health.
Do I have it right?