Thank you, Mr. Chair.
Between the original motion of Dr. Ellis and the amendment of Dr. Hanley and the various subamendments, there has been some movement in who we're calling. I noticed that in Dr. Hanley's amendment they added the Auditor General, and I don't think the Auditor General was in the original motion. I'm curious about what role or testimony the Auditor General may have in this.
Some of my colleagues could maybe advise on whether the Auditor General had any involvement in this matter. If they did, than it's fine, but if the Auditor General did not have any involvement, then I may end up moving that we remove the Auditor General.