Mr. Chair, that's fine. I thank you for answering.
I guess my point is that we're moving to an antigen test that is 44% sensitive in a system that's only collecting 25% of the data. Why would we do that? What's the benefit to our border security? To me, the math doesn't add up. That means 56% of asymptomatic people coming into the country could be told that they have a false negative test, and we're only collecting 25% of the data. Mathematically that makes no sense to me.