I did not know that a relative of tobacco was used to produce the vaccine, which I find very interesting. The fact that Philip Morris International invested in this company perhaps could be seen as a fact that there are many tobacco producers around the world—for example, in Zimbabwe—and people with pretty limited incomes. Yes, although we would like to see nobody smoking cigarettes anymore, and I'm looking around the room.... I'm not sure if anyone here smokes cigarettes. I know of some people.
However, potentially finding more useful alternatives to the use of tobacco plants could be seen as being socially desirable in many poor countries where you have tobacco producers who have very limited income. Am I right? Perhaps as the company's CEO, this isn't one of the things you consider, but I'm suggesting there might be some social utility, in fact, in using tobacco plants for purposes other other than making cigarettes.