My initial question is for Dr. Humphreys.
I share a bit of skepticism about the safe supply position for the same reasons that you've already talked about. However, do you not think that it's possible that there is a certain subset of the population that would benefit from safe supply? Some people are dependent on narcotics and perhaps dependent on a fixed level of narcotics. Then there is the fact that they can't get the narcotics, so they buy them on the street, where often they're contaminated with fentanyl or carfentanil.
Do you think it's possible—although, perhaps in general, safe supply is not a good idea for everybody—that there may be a subset of the population for which, in fact, it is a good idea?