Just to be clear in terms of a code of conduct, what we see in codes of conduct typically is more about general behaviour of members. I have the one from England here. It's a concept of selflessness, integrity, objectivity, accountability, openness, honesty, leadership—personal behaviours that are expected. Here the mandate of this committee, as I understand it, is dealing just with harassment. So if you were to deal with a code of conduct, it would have to deal only with the question of harassment.
The problem we see in this context is that members of Parliament are, as I said, independent. They're equal, so it's theoretically one against a person at the same level. You don't have this employer-employee relationship on which all the different policies typically are based. That's why you would have an employer who has sanctions.
Here you're amongst equals, so you have to decide what—