I think the other aspect, when you talk politics, is some of the language that we've used around this, recognizing that health is primarily a provincial-territorial matter. We have not been promoting the notion of this being a supervisory body that would oversee or take over the mandate of provincial and territorial governments. What we're talking about is a mechanism to work in partnership with provincial and territorial governments.
In the recently released federal-provincial-territorial pan-Canadian planning framework for HHR, they talk about intersectoral and interdisciplinary multi-stakeholder planning, but they don't outline a mechanism for that. That's what we're trying to promote, something that would work in partnership with them that would provide analytical support to their planning process.
Many of the smaller provinces don't have the capacity to do the kind of HHR planning that large provinces like Ontario and their government have. So we see this as a real value perhaps as a starting point in helping those smaller governments to understand the planning process, where all the data fits in, where the research fits in, and how they're affected by the other provinces, from a mobility perspective and other aspects. So certainly we see this as a partnership, not a supervisory body.