Would I be wrong to make a connection, in a sense, between the person who is not able to work, for whatever reason...? You're saying that, no, let's not measure everyone's worth by whether they can work or not, right? In some cases, some people aren't going to be able to work, at least as things stand at the moment and the way things are organized, but even I think in some cases it's not foreseeable.
You have people--of course, we heard about this earlier--who are 58 or 60, who've cut fish all their lives on hard cement floors, whose hands have been in cold water, who've got arthritis and bad backs. In both cases, they need adequate support to survive. Is it wrong to equate them in some fashion and say we need to have something that responds to both of those needs? That brings me back to the question of what role the Government of Canada has versus what role does the province have in relation to these issues?