I'll try to restrict myself to a minute.
As far as the formal and informal, this is part of our problem in that we're restricted to the training act. As I said, it was conceived on the accounting logic. Basically what they're asking the employers to do is to figure how much training they have done in their businesses over a year and report that they have done at least 1% of their payroll. If they can't prove they have done this through the mechanism attached to the act, then they have to take 1% of their payroll and send it to the Ministry of Revenue.
We're trying to get away from that logic for the smaller businesses with $1 million and less in payroll and implement some system that will allow the employers to bring their manpower up-to-date as far as their skills are concerned, and recognize those skills within the labour market, without having to go through the education system. That we agree on; there's a consensus among unions and employers in Quebec.
I would say that the devil is in the details. All will depend on the way it is implemented. Of course, we might have some disagreement on the way it's implemented, but our main concern, as far as CFIB is concerned, is to keep it simple and make sure we don't overregulate, because then we're going to kill the whole idea of the principle. This is unfortunately what happens in a lot of legislation, as far as principles are concerned.