I mean the two-week wait time, and also the 14 weeks. It's a short-term solution for us. Of course it would help, but it would help us more if, during the times they are on EI, they weren't encouraged to leave the industry. I think that's a more important point. We are seasonal. Fishing, planting trees, cutting lawns—it's not going to happen in the winter. We are in Canada and we have to expect, and embrace, a cold nature. We just can't work during that time.
Our industry has been proactive on this. We've been tossing around a few ideas—hour pooling, banking hours. All of them, though, have been on an ad hoc basis. I think these things need to be explored more. They are short-term solutions. They would definitely help us, but in the long term, we need to be progressive and look at solutions that will benefit everyone, including the EI system. We don't want to be draining it. We're entrepreneurs, and we want to find ways that will benefit everyone, including our employees and our companies. We have the core people who stay. But how do we keep everyone else, especially the unskilled labour? It's easier for them to leave for another industry if they're encouraged to do so. That's the question we have to answer: how we keep the lower level? What you said is true: continuous training really makes a difference.