I'm not sure I know the total answer to that. The first thing that happened in Ontario that was quite important was that in the year 2000 the Ontario Human Rights Commission, which is headed by Mr. Norton, made a very strong presentation and report against mandatory retirement. So that report and the human rights initiative were there from the year 2000. I think this was extremely important.
The other thing that happened, however, was that in 2003 the government of the day in Ontario was facing an election, and I think they thought they could win some votes by actually calling for the end of mandatory retirement. I think it was a fabulous thing for the government of that day to have done, and they actually said that they would end mandatory retirement just prior to the election. Unfortunately, they were voted out, but it was there on the table, and the succeeding government, the Liberals, under Mr. McGuinty, took up that issue about a year later. Although at first they didn't show any interest in it, they found it very interesting later on. I think it was, as I said, about a year later that the Liberal government decided to make the same kind of initiative the Tories had done.
My feeling is that it was, as I said, propelled by the Ontario Human Rights Commission, but I think it was also propelled by the growing recognition of governments, both on the Liberal side and the Conservative side, that there was a large number of people in Ontario who wanted to get rid of it.