But there is at least a process in place, whereas the temporary workers don't have anything.
My question goes back to what Ms. Brown raised. We are talking about employability issues. Immigration is certainly one of them. I believe the committee believes it's going to be one of the things that helps address those things. Right now there is no mechanism in place for the temporary foreign workers, certainly undocumented workers anywhere. Whether it's in the U.S. or Canada, there's no status.
Would there be some concerns...? I take Ms. Brown's points very seriously. There are probably between governments--which involves the people who are doing the negotiation, not us here on the ground so much--some very serious reasons why those agreements are struck the way they are. My question is, do you feel there would be some reluctance if all of a sudden we started saying we're going to waive those things and, by the way, you're going to have access? Do you think there would be a concern from some of those countries to say “Wait a second, I don't think we want to lose some of our people”?
I realize it will be your opinion, but is that a possible concern?