I haven't really, but if you adapt the work, I still have the concern that you're trying to keep that worker in the workforce. If you try to adapt that worker to the workforce in a different line of work, then the government, or whoever is studying this, may look at it and say, “Well, look, he can't do that, or she can't do that job, but we can keep that person in this job, so why do they need a pension?” If they're too disabled to work in one thing but they're doing well in another beyond the age of 65, there's still the possibility of saying, “As long as they do well in that job for the next five years, as they keep working, maybe we could raise the pensionable age or cut back on the pension.”
I think the danger is always there. Even that is still depending on the older worker. I think that's what you're saying. They were in a job that was too difficult, but perhaps they could do something in another way, another job that's lighter. That may be something that some people would want to do, but I think there are dangers in that. That's still depending on the older worker.