All right.
Mr. Finnie, in his comments, suggested that 50% of the poor, by your definition—I'm not sure which definition you were using, and perhaps you can let us know about that—were a transitory element; that is, they were there for a given year, but they weren't there the following year.
I'm wondering, Mr. Sarlo, whether you could.... According to your basic needs poverty line definition, 4.9% of Canadians, you say, are under that limit. How many of those people do you think would be in a situation where it's a transitory state for them: they would not have been there the previous year, but they're there at the present time, and they likely won't be there in the future?