I haven't finished. That was my first question. We have to hear everything in relation to this bill, but isn't there an order that needs to be followed? We agreed on this last week. I don't know the exact wording of the motion we adopted, but I thought we adopted an agenda.
Having said that, coming back to an old motion should be more complicated than simply rudely interrupting a witness we took the appropriate steps to invite in order to move a motion on the work plan.
Furthermore, the member is calling for six more meetings in order to debate this bill when we still don't know the number of witnesses who registered before 5 p.m. yesterday. As we say back home, that's like putting the cart before the horse. We are proceeding in a totally disorderly fashion. Let's wait for the steering committee and the list of witnesses who've registered. Otherwise, this would be seen exactly for what it is, a political tactic called filibustering.
I'd ask that we get back to the agenda and to the excellent presentation being made by my colleague, Mr. Richard Nadeau.