Just for a couple of clarifications more specifically about the bill, and just to come back to the question of essential services, I just want to understand that you are proposing that it would be done on a case-by-case basis, based on the industry or the business in question. If a legal strike took place, the employer would sit down—
In B.C., there's a process. The union and the employer go to the Labour Relations Board and actually make proposals about what are considered to be central services. The board, either through consensus or a directive, actually then designates what are essential services, depending on what the business is or what the service is. You are suggesting a similar process here. There wouldn't be a list of essential services. It would depend on what the sector was or what the business was.
I don't see anything in here that references that, unless I've missed it. Do we actually need to add a section that would allow that mechanism to begin?
Secondly, just to come back to proposed subsection 94(2.4), where you say “The measures referred to in subsection (2.2) shall exclusively be conservation measures”, it's just not clear. If you look at proposed subsection (2.2), it's dealing with the ability of the employer to use management for services. I'm not sure what “conservation measures” are. Is it referring to the wrong proposed subsection? Is it referring to proposed subsection (2.3), which is “Protection of property”? Could you give me some clarification of that?