Thank you very much.
The issue here is all about the impact it would have on consumers through the banks. It is all about communication channels. That's the key here.
We are not directly impacted, from a replacement workers perspective, because as Mr. Georgetti pointed out, we only have less than one quarter of 1% of our workforce unionized.
However, if replacement workers are banned in telecommunication companies, that is where the impact would be. As you rightly pointed out, getting to your money is key. If we can't transfer money, or if we can't get to our money—Every single one of us is a customer somewhere. If it's not my bank, it's in Mr. Alborino's bank, or anywhere else for that matter. It's all about the possibility of not being able to transfer the money or get access to our money.
That's the key here. It's not the direct impact on the banks from the replacement workers point of view. It's the non-access to all the financial means and the financial investments that we all have in the banks or in the banking industry. It's for the consumers more than for the banks.