Mr. Chairman, I have a point of order. I find that this is intellectually dishonest. We must read subsection 92(2.4) after section 92(2.3). We must also read subsection 92(2.2) in its entirety. It lends a false meaning to subsection 92(2.4). This does not refer to anti-scab measures, it refers to measures that are needed to avoid destruction. This refers to subsection 92(2.3).
On December 7th, 2006. See this statement in context.