It is a bit more complicated than that, with all due respect. You are entirely right, the Quebec labour legislation states that both parties must decide, and if there is no such agreement, they must resort to the Conseil. I think that nonetheless, there is a form of monitoring and a process that ensures that these steps are taken and that a solution can be found.
For my own benefit, I spoke to the Conseil des services essentiels to try to find examples, to find out how things are done, and to study the case law. I have here an example, dated January 31, 2002: TIRU (Canada) Inc., 900, Industrielle Street, Quebec and the Canadian Union of Public Employees versus Quebec City, as well as the decision handed down by the Conseil des services essentiels.
This is just one example, and there may be many more that you know better than I do. This shows how important the monitoring was in obtaining solutions to these issues and in reaching a conclusion. As you said at the beginning of your statements, without such parameters, it is difficult for us to know exactly how things would develop. To help the parties agree on what is essential, if they are asked this question, whatever the industry may be, as Mr. Bouvier, said it would depend on the conditions of that industry. I think that we would obtain some results, but I do not think that this a question that we have to face today. There are many more things to do before getting to this issue.