Okay, thanks.
My next question is for Mr. Kelly-Gagnon. Regarding the tone of the conversation, it seems so far as if the overwhelming rationale given by union leaders who have been before us on this legislation...virtually every one has appeared to be violence-related, that these work stoppages and the use of replacement workers lead to violence. Upon further questioning, usually they will say half-heartedly that the violence isn't justified.
I want to ask you a question, and I totally reject the notion that violence should come into the equation. It's not justified one way or another. Is it true there's been less violence in Quebec due to this law?