Based on your suggestion today, at an earlier meeting when the mover of the bill, Monsieur Nadeau, came to speak to his bill, why did you allow a full discussion right in the middle of his presentation? You seemed to have no objection then to putting something off until the end of the meeting in planning the time. Why did you decide that then, but you're now saying this should be put off until the end of the meeting? It seems very contradictory.
I'm sure you remember that meeting when the mover of the bill, Monsieur Nadeau, was here. Basically one of your members interrupted him in the middle of his presentation and you allowed that to happen. It was ruled to be in order.