Thank you, Mr. Chair.
I have one comment to begin and then a question. I would think that the most useful data would not be in comparing Ontario and Quebec, it would be in comparing Quebec before and Quebec after. It would be comparing Ontario before, Ontario after, and then Ontario after that. It would be comparing B.C. before and B.C. after. It would look at the impact in individual jurisdictions as opposed to comparing across jurisdictions. Labour environments in different provinces may be very different. So I think it'd be quite useful if that information were available.
All sides are arguing balance. All sides are arguing that in fact the implementation of, or the absence of implementation, is going to generate the balance or is going to remove the balance. I think that all of us can imagine the exaggerations of stories, that if this is the case in the hypothetical, then the exaggeration can happen. That's why you have labour relations; you avoid the exaggerations. You use other means to avoid the exaggerations. That becomes part of doing business. The just-in-time business, that becomes part of everything.
To each side here, you've all heard each other. If you had one minute to offer your best argument, after having heard all the other sides of it, what would your best argument be?
Mr. Massy, what is your best argument?
Turning to the other side here, perhaps I'd ask you to decide on somebody to offer one minute's worth of your best argument.