What you might do is force that employer to seek alternative means, to go through a non-union supply chain. It's certainly not preferred, but equally—Right now, without the anti-replacement legislation, both are very motivated to keep the industry operational, and the track record shows it. What it would do is clearly favour the unions. Our experience, certainly out west, is that you would have a high-cost settlement, perhaps more than you would without the anti-replacement.
On January 31st, 2007. See this statement in context.