Yes, and I thought that worked quite well. It was a setting where there was thoughtful consideration and lots of back and forth between the various parties. As Mr. Lessard said just a while ago, it calls on those of us who speak on behalf of our caucuses to go back and do our homework and get some sense of where the caucus is on particular issues. It gives us a chance to do that and then bring recommendations before the committee.
I know that in the 13 years I spent at Queen's Park, for example, that's exactly what we did. I sat on lots of committees and there was always a subcommittee with a member from each party to look at some of the more logistical elements of how the committee would move forward. I always found it helpful to do that, and I would suggest we continue to do that here.