The other thing that concerns me, when I hear from the employer side of this discussion, is the sense that you somehow don't trust that your workers will in fact take responsibility for the protection of the public in the work they do at times when there might be a work stoppage or a negotiation. Is there any evidence to indicate that workers will, in those instances—?
My experience, for example, when we had the ice storm, was that workers of all kinds came to the fore and were in there 24/7 trying to clean up. We see it over and over again as we see the different natural disasters happen. It's the workers who are in there cleaning up those things, working 24/7 to get that done.
I asked the person who came before us representing airports if in fact his workers came forward when that Air France plane came down and crashed at the Toronto airport. And he said that, yes, they did, that they were there 24/7.
To me, the suggestion in the presentations was that as far as this emergency service is concerned, you somehow don't trust or believe that the workers in an anti-replacement situation would in fact come forward and make sure that the public was protected. Is that what you're saying?