I'd like to address a couple of points on that. Number one is, I'm not sure of the source of that information on the taxation levels. There has been some confusion in the media over the last few months about how much of the money parents would actually receive.
One of the important aspects of how we structured our universal child-care plan was that we said the $1,200 universal child care benefit would be taxable in the hands of the lower-income parent. With almost half of families having at least one stay-at-home parent, that stay-at-home parent doesn't have an income, there would be no tax on it. I want to make sure that everybody understands that. This tax is in the hands of the lower-income spouse because we want to make sure Canadian families get as much benefit as possible from this. That's why we call it a “benefit."
There have been some other, shall we say, confused statements as to how much of this money parents would actually get to keep, apart from the tax side of it, and that's through something called “clawbacks” at the provincial level. I'm really pleased that 11 of the 13 provinces and territories have joined the federal government in saying, no, they will not claw back this amount. In other words, they will not count it against the applicant's ability to get other social benefits. That means they're going to keep a lot more of it than what many people in the media have led people to believe, so this is good news for Canadians. I'm not sure of the total numbers, or if any money was brought back, how it would be invested. Quite frankly, it would be up to the Minister of Finance.