I agree. I echo that.
I'd like to offer one point to the concerns addressed on my right here, which is that aside from the business impacts, which you've heard a great deal about from this group, the point of the law is to stop people from working. It prevents bargaining unit members from re-entering the workplace during a strike. Essentially, their union will tell them not to work. It will create greater conflicts between unions and workers. It will prevent people from going back to work. It will prevent replacement workers from going back to work. That can't be perceived as a positive economic outcome. I'm told repeatedly that it prolongs strikes, notwithstanding what some people believe. That's also tremendously detrimental to working people it's supposed to serve.