If I may, the short answer to that question is a yes or a no. I don't think this is a problem that can be addressed by trying to fiddle at the margins.
But to come back to the question of credibility, I don't think anybody here is predicting that this bill by itself is going to cause the apocalypse. The fact is it's something that will tilt the balance of power at the bargaining table at the margins.
The point I'm trying to make is that you can look at it in isolation and ask this: is it going to change life in the country a huge amount, one way or the other? I would say no, but the fact is it's part of an overall economic strategy.
How many things is a governing party going to do? How many things is an opposition party going to propose that constitute a strategy for the country? What policy changes do we want to make that will help this country grow, create better jobs, and bring in investments? What policies are we going to propose that may have an economic cost but serve other objectives that are more important?
All I'm trying to say is this is something that will have negative economic consequences. You have to look at it as part of what you're going to propose as your overall strategy for making this country a better and stronger place.