Any strike has an economic impact, but I think the issue we're trying to deal with here is that the use of replacement workers is actually prolonging that dispute and actually limiting the ability of the parties to get to the table and to come to a collective agreement, to settle it.
We're not talking about strikes here. The strike in the port of Vancouver, I understand, had a huge impact, but that was about the strike. This is about replacement workers and whether or not they can be used.
The absence of replacement workers means there is then more focus on dealing with the strike and getting it resolved. Ending it earlier, I'm sure you would agree, is preferable to having it dragged out, because, yes, there would be a greater economic impact then.