Former? That's probably why he's a former member, because he said silly things like that. That's probably why he's not a member today.
Honestly, Mr. Lake, I don't know what to say. Quite frankly, I'd think he's out of touch with reality. We've got a serious imbalance in this code. I heard today and I've read some of the evidence from the previous sessions, and there was a lot of “Chicken Little, the sky is falling” kind of stuff, how essential services weren't addressed in this bill, and they were referring to proposed subsection (2.4). But proposed subsection (2.4) of the bill is actually complementary to section 87.4 of the code. It actually builds on the language of the code and clarifies what the intent of section 87.4 was. I mean, that's the beauty of this bill.