Okay, thank you for that.
I have another question for you. We've heard a lot about agreements to maintain services. The position of some witnesses has been that it's quite an easy thing to simply have unions and employers agree to maintain services in the case of a stoppage—we heard that yesterday, for example—even for critical federal infrastructure.
I guess it concerns me that, once again, we're creating a problem as we search for a solution to a problem that doesn't exist. In fact, it's arguable that we can protect essential services if we pass this bill at all. It also seems highly inappropriate to me that at the federal level we simply rely on the goodwill of either unions or employers to protect, for example, 9-1-1 services. Does this ad hoc process of protection seem wise to you?