I would agree. I think the likely impact of this legislation is not going to be on the strikes once they happen per se. I think the more significant impact of the passage of this legislation would be, I suspect, for a period of time, an increase in labour disruptions. You could argue that it would affect the leverage both parties have at the table. You may see a changing of the balance of leverage that's there, and both parties need to sort through what that actually means.
Whenever you change the rules, as was mentioned in terms of complaints and legislation, but also in terms of what happens at the bargaining table, there is a testing process, and I would suspect you will see new legislation tested from both sides. Before that you know the set of rules that are there, and you know how far you can go and where the lines are and what the likely outcomes are. That probably will have more impact than the $1,000, depending on the company. For a company like Telus, in their strike last year, I don't suspect $1,000 a day was as significant as it would be for some of the smaller companies.
I would agree. I think most parties don't want to put themselves in a situation where they're breaking the law, and that's the bigger issue.